BLOG – ManWinWin Software

Mastering FMEA: 5 Essential Steps for Proactive Risk Management

Discover how Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can enhance your risk management strategy with these 5 essential steps. Learn to identify, analyze, and prioritize failure modes effectively to mitigate risks and ensure product reliability and safety.

FMEA, or Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, is a pivotal methodology used across industries to preemptively identify and mitigate potential failures within systems and processes. By systematically analyzing failure modes and their consequences, FMEA enhances risk management strategies, ensuring robustness and reliability in products and operations.

Lockout Tagout - ManWinWin CMMS


Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) stands as a cornerstone in risk management methodologies across various industries. It offers a systematic approach to anticipate, identify, and mitigate potential failures within systems, processes, or products before they manifest. By meticulously analyzing failure modes and their potential effects, FMEA empowers organizations to proactively address risks, thereby enhancing product reliability, process efficiency, and overall safety standards.

At its core, FMEA involves a structured evaluation process encompassing the identification of components or processes, analysis of potential failure modes, and assessment of their impacts. Through this methodical examination, organizations gain insights into the severity, occurrence, and detectability of potential failures, enabling them to prioritize mitigation efforts effectively. As industries navigate increasingly complex landscapes, FMEA remains a vital tool, offering a preemptive strategy to safeguard against unforeseen risks and uphold the integrity of operations.

1. Identification of Failure Modes

The first step in FMEA is to identify all possible failure modes that could occur within the system, process, or product being analyzed. This involves brainstorming sessions, historical data analysis, and input from subject matter experts. Failure modes can be classified as any potential way in which the system, process, or product could fail to perform its intended function.

Brainstorming Sessions: Brainstorming sessions involve bringing together a diverse team of individuals with relevant expertise to systematically identify potential failure modes. During these sessions, team members leverage their knowledge, experience, and perspectives to generate a comprehensive list of failure modes. Open discussion and creativity are encouraged to uncover both common and rare failure scenarios.

Historical Data Analysis: Historical data analysis involves reviewing past records, incident reports, warranty claims, maintenance logs, and other sources of information to identify patterns of failure. Analyzing historical data can provide valuable insights into common failure modes, their root causes, and their impacts on performance, safety, and reliability. This information helps ensure that known failure modes are not overlooked during the FMEA process.

Input from Subject Matter Experts (SMEs): Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) possess specialized knowledge and experience related to the system, process, or product under analysis. Their input is invaluable for identifying failure modes that may not be apparent to others and for understanding the underlying mechanisms behind potential failures. SMEs from various disciplines, including design, engineering, manufacturing, operations, maintenance, and quality assurance, contribute their expertise to ensure a comprehensive assessment.

Classification of Failure Modes: Failure modes can manifest in various ways, ranging from minor deviations to catastrophic failures. They can affect different aspects of the system, process, or product, including functionality, safety, quality, performance, and compliance. As part of the identification process, failure modes are classified based on their nature, severity, and potential impact. This classification helps prioritize analysis efforts and allocate resources effectively.

Comprehensive Coverage: To ensure thoroughness, the identification of failure modes aims to encompass all conceivable ways in which the system, process, or product could fail to perform its intended function. This includes considering normal and abnormal operating conditions, as well as potential interactions between different components, subsystems, or external factors. By striving for comprehensive coverage, FMEA teams minimize the risk of overlooking critical failure modes that could compromise reliability or safety.

By employing a combination of brainstorming sessions, historical data analysis, and input from subject matter experts, FMEA teams can systematically identify a wide range of failure modes and lay the groundwork for subsequent analysis and mitigation efforts. This proactive approach enhances the robustness and resilience of systems, processes, and products, ultimately improving their reliability and performance.

ManWinWin Software is the result of 40+ years of experience and know-how

With thousands of users in 120+ countries in the World. Created by Portuguese Engineers has been improved with  implementations, and listening to thousands of clients worldwide using the system, their day-to-day struggles, their needs and wants.

We have helped companies around the world to improve their maintenance


By Gartner Group 

Microsoft Partner

Application Development





Christian Schilling

ManWinWin Software actively challenged our way of thinking and guided us to focus on what was most important, ie on what we really needed.

Project Manager

2. Assessment of Failure Effects

Once the failure modes have been identified, the next step is to assess the potential effects or consequences of each failure mode. This includes considering the impact on safety, functionality, quality, performance, and compliance with regulations or standards. The severity of each effect is typically rated on a scale, such as low, medium, or high, to prioritize further analysis and mitigation efforts.

Safety Impact: Safety is often the foremost concern in many industries, especially those involving critical systems or products. Failure modes that pose a risk to the safety of users, operators, or the environment are given high priority. The assessment considers the potential for injuries, fatalities, environmental damage, or other hazardous consequences.

Functionality Impact: Failure modes that could impact the intended function of the system, process, or product are evaluated in terms of their effects on functionality. This includes identifying how failures might prevent the system from performing its primary tasks or meeting user requirements. It also considers the extent to which failures might affect usability or user experience.

Quality Impact: Quality is crucial for ensuring customer satisfaction and maintaining reputation. Failure modes that could lead to defects, non-conformities, or deviations from specifications are assessed for their impact on product quality. This includes considering the potential for defects to escape detection during inspection or testing, leading to customer complaints or recalls.

Performance Impact: The performance of a system or product can be affected by various failure modes. This aspect of the assessment considers how failures might degrade performance metrics such as speed, accuracy, reliability, efficiency, or durability. For example, a failure in a manufacturing process might lead to increased cycle times or decreased throughput.

Regulatory and Standards Compliance Impact: Many industries are subject to regulations and standards governing the design, manufacture, and operation of products and systems. Failure modes that could result in non-compliance with applicable regulations or standards are assessed for their impact. This includes considering the potential for fines, legal liabilities, or damage to reputation resulting from non-compliance.

The severity of each effect is typically rated using a predefined scale, such as low, medium, or high. This rating helps prioritize further analysis and mitigation efforts, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively to address the most critical risks.


Welcome to ManWinWin Software

Maximize efficiency and streamline your maintenance processes with ManWinWin Software, the most experienced maintenance management software provider. Our advanced solutions, backed by years of expertise, optimize workflows and drive operational excellence.

Discover how our trusted software can revolutionize your maintenance operations today.


3. Evaluation of Failure Causes

After identifying failure modes and their effects, the FMEA team investigates the potential causes or mechanisms behind each failure mode. Understanding the root causes of failures is crucial for developing effective mitigation strategies. Causes may include design flaws, manufacturing defects, environmental factors, human error, or external influences.

Design Flaws: Design flaws refer to inadequacies or deficiencies in the design of a system, process, or product that could lead to failure. This may involve weaknesses in the engineering specifications, improper selection of materials or components, inadequate consideration of operating conditions, or incomplete understanding of user requirements. Identifying and addressing design flaws early in the development process can prevent costly failures downstream.

Manufacturing Defects: Manufacturing defects are deviations from the intended design or specifications that occur during the production process. These defects may result from equipment malfunctions, process variations, material inconsistencies, or human error during manufacturing. Understanding the potential manufacturing defects helps identify opportunities for process improvements, quality control measures, or supplier management strategies to minimize their occurrence.

Environmental Factors: Environmental factors such as temperature extremes, humidity, vibration, corrosion, or exposure to contaminants can contribute to failures in systems or products. These factors may accelerate wear and tear, degrade materials, or induce stress on components, leading to premature failure. Assessing the susceptibility of the system or product to environmental influences helps determine appropriate mitigation measures, such as protective coatings, environmental controls, or design modifications.

Human Error: Human error, including mistakes made during design, manufacturing, installation, operation, maintenance, or inspection, can introduce vulnerabilities and contribute to failures. This may involve errors in data entry, procedural non-compliance, misinterpretation of instructions, inadequate training, or fatigue. Implementing error-proofing techniques, enhancing training programs, or redesigning processes to reduce reliance on human intervention can help mitigate the risk of failures caused by human error.

External Influences: External influences such as supply chain disruptions, regulatory changes, geopolitical events, or unforeseen market dynamics can impact the reliability and performance of systems or products. These influences may introduce new risks or exacerbate existing ones, necessitating proactive risk management strategies. Collaborating with stakeholders, monitoring industry trends, and maintaining flexibility in design and operations can help mitigate the impact of external influences on failure risk.

By thoroughly investigating these potential causes or mechanisms behind each failure mode, the FMEA team can develop targeted mitigation strategies to address the root causes and minimize the likelihood of failures occurring. This proactive approach enhances reliability, safety, and performance while reducing costs associated with downtime, repairs, or recalls.

Join ManWinWin Software, the world’s most experienced company in CMMS!

Choose a better way to manage your Maintenance

Watch or book a Demo

Watch a recorded demo or get to know ManWinWin guided by one of our experts.

Use ManWinWin free version

Free forever industrial maintenance management software up to 100 Assets. Start today!

4. Risk Assessment and Prioritization

FMEA employs various metrics to assess and prioritize risks associated with each failure mode. Two primary metrics used in FMEA are Severity, which indicates the potential impact of a failure, and Occurrence, which represents the likelihood of the failure occurring. Multiplying Severity by Occurrence yields the Risk Priority Number (RPN), a numerical value used to prioritize mitigation actions. Additional factors such as Detection (the likelihood of detecting a failure before it occurs) may also be considered.

Severity (S):  Severity refers to the potential impact or consequences of a failure mode on the system, process, or product and its stakeholders. It typically involves rating the severity of each failure mode on a predefined scale, such as low, medium, or high. This rating considers factors such as safety implications, functionality impairment, quality degradation, performance reduction, and compliance violations. Higher severity ratings indicate failure modes with more severe consequences.

Occurrence (O): Occurrence represents the likelihood or frequency of a failure mode occurring within a given timeframe. It involves assessing the probability of the failure mode manifesting under normal operating conditions or environmental factors. Occurrence ratings may be based on historical data, engineering analysis, statistical models, or expert judgment. Failure modes with higher occurrence ratings are considered more likely to occur and pose greater risks.

Risk Priority Number (RPN):  The Risk Priority Number (RPN) is a numerical value calculated by multiplying the Severity (S) by the Occurrence (O) for each failure mode. Mathematically, RPN = S × O. The RPN provides a quantitative measure of the overall risk associated with each failure mode, taking into account both its severity and likelihood. Higher RPN values indicate failure modes with higher overall risk levels. Prioritizing failure modes based on their RPNs helps focus attention on addressing the most critical risks first.

Detection (D): Detection represents the likelihood of detecting a failure mode before it causes harm or adverse effects. It involves assessing the effectiveness of existing detection methods, such as inspections, tests, alarms, or monitoring systems, in identifying potential failures. Detection ratings typically range from low to high, with higher ratings indicating greater confidence in detecting failures before they escalate. Including Detection as a factor in risk assessment helps prioritize mitigation actions aimed at improving detection capabilities for high-risk failure modes.

Mitigation Prioritization: Based on the calculated RPNs and Detection ratings, FMEA teams prioritize mitigation actions to address the highest-risk failure modes. This involves allocating resources, implementing design changes, process improvements, preventive maintenance measures, training programs, or other interventions aimed at reducing the severity, occurrence, or detectability of high-risk failure modes. By focusing on mitigating the most critical risks first, organizations can effectively enhance reliability, safety, and performance while optimizing resource utilization.

By systematically assessing and prioritizing risks using metrics such as Severity, Occurrence, and Detection, FMEA enables organizations to identify and address the most significant failure modes proactively. This data-driven approach helps prioritize mitigation efforts, allocate resources effectively, and ultimately enhance the reliability, safety, and performance of systems, processes, and products.

Discover ManWinWin services in maintenance management consulting


The implementation consultancy is the component that turns a good software into a good solution.


Training is the component that consolidates and sustains the solution on the client.

maintenance management software

Want to know how the world’s most experienced CMMS maintenance management software can help you?

5. Development of Mitigation Strategies

Based on the prioritized list of failure modes and associated risks, the FMEA team develops mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate the identified risks. These strategies may include design changes, process improvements, redundancy measures, preventive maintenance schedules, training programs, or other actions aimed at reducing the likelihood or severity of potential failures. The effectiveness of these strategies should be periodically reviewed and updated as necessary.

Design Changes: Design changes involve modifying the design of the system, process, or product to address potential failure modes and enhance reliability, safety, or performance. This may include redesigning components or subsystems, improving material selection, incorporating fail-safe mechanisms, or optimizing tolerances to mitigate risks effectively. Design changes should be carefully evaluated to ensure they achieve the desired improvements without introducing new failure modes or unintended consequences.

Process Improvements: Process improvements focus on enhancing the manufacturing, assembly, or operational processes to reduce the likelihood of failure modes occurring. This may involve optimizing process parameters, implementing quality control measures, enhancing equipment maintenance procedures, or streamlining workflow processes to minimize errors and variability. Process improvements aim to increase process robustness, consistency, and efficiency while reducing the risk of defects or deviations.

Redundancy Measures: Redundancy measures involve introducing redundant components, subsystems, or backup systems to mitigate the impact of potential failures. Redundancy can provide alternative pathways or fail-safe mechanisms to maintain system functionality in the event of a failure. This may include incorporating redundant sensors, actuators, power supplies, communication links, or redundant systems that can seamlessly take over operations in case of primary system failure.

Preventive Maintenance Schedules: Preventive maintenance schedules involve implementing regular inspection, servicing, and maintenance activities to detect and address potential failure modes before they escalate. This includes conducting routine inspections, lubrication, calibration, cleaning, and replacement of worn or aging components to prevent unexpected failures. Preventive maintenance schedules aim to increase equipment reliability, extend service life, and minimize unplanned downtime.

Training Programs: Training programs focus on enhancing the knowledge, skills, and awareness of personnel involved in the design, operation, maintenance, and inspection of the system, process, or product. This includes providing comprehensive training on safety protocols, standard operating procedures, troubleshooting techniques, and best practices for risk management. Well-trained personnel are better equipped to identify and respond to potential failure modes, improving overall system reliability and performance.

Continuous Improvement and Review: Mitigation strategies should be periodically reviewed, evaluated, and updated to ensure their effectiveness in addressing identified risks. This involves monitoring performance metrics, analyzing failure data, soliciting feedback from stakeholders, and incorporating lessons learned from past experiences. Continuous improvement efforts aim to refine mitigation strategies, adapt to changing conditions, and stay proactive in managing risks over time.

By implementing a combination of these mitigation strategies, the FMEA team can effectively reduce or eliminate the risks associated with identified failure modes, enhancing the reliability, safety, and performance of the system, process, or product. Regular review and continuous improvement ensure that mitigation efforts remain effective and aligned with evolving needs and challenges.

Implementing FMEA with ManWinWin

ManWinWin, as a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS), can significantly aid in implementing FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) for proactive risk management in several ways.

Data Management and Organization:  ManWinWin provides a centralized platform for collecting, organizing, and managing data related to equipment, assets, maintenance activities, and historical performance. This data serves as a valuable resource for conducting FMEA by providing insights into equipment failure patterns, maintenance history, and criticality assessments.

Failure Mode Identification: ManWinWin facilitates the identification of failure modes by allowing users to record and analyze equipment failures, breakdowns, and performance issues. Maintenance records, work orders, and incident reports can be used to identify common failure modes, their causes, and their impacts on operations.

Mitigation Strategy Development: ManWinWin supports the development of mitigation strategies by providing a platform for documenting and implementing corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs). Users can create maintenance tasks, work orders, and action plans to address identified failure modes, including design changes, process improvements, and preventive maintenance schedules.

Monitoring and Performance Tracking: ManWinWin allows users to monitor the effectiveness of mitigation strategies and track performance metrics over time. By capturing maintenance data, equipment reliability, downtime, and cost indicators, users can evaluate the impact of FMEA-driven initiatives on asset reliability, operational efficiency, and risk reduction.

Integration with FMEA Processes:  ManWinWin can be seamlessly integrated with FMEA processes to streamline data exchange, collaboration, and decision-making. By linking FMEA analyses with CMMS data, users can leverage insights from risk assessments to optimize maintenance strategies, resource allocation, and asset management practices.

ManWinWin serves as a powerful tool for implementing FMEA and proactive risk management practices by providing robust data management capabilities, risk assessment tools, mitigation strategy development support, performance tracking mechanisms, integration with FMEA processes, and training resources. By leveraging these capabilities, organizations can enhance asset reliability, reduce downtime, and mitigate operational risks effectively.

Join ManWinWin Software, the world’s most experienced company in CMMS!

Choose a better way to manage your Maintenance